EDITOR’S
NOTE: The Does God Exist? ministry offers $1,000 scholarships to young
people who demonstrate the ability to deal with apologetic issues and
who are going on to further their education. This money is not from
donations made to the program but funds given in memory of Edith
Lawson, Connie Parsons, and Phyllis Clayton, three women who were
instrumental in the starting of this work. In 2008, $3,000 was given in
scholarships, and the following is an essay by one of the winners,
Brooke Walls of Bloomington, Indiana.
Plato said, “The greatest mistake in the treatment of diseases is that
there are physicians for the body and physicians for the soul, although
the two cannot be separated .” While Plato said this many years ago,
his ideas are still pertinent in today’s society. Many people believe
that medicine and faith should remain separate and that there is no
connection between the two. However, new research shows that faith
plays a major role in the health of patients. As a result of these
studies, there is a growing interest in exploring the role of
physicians in patients’ spirituality. Some medical schools are even
including classes on spirituality to enhance the physicians’ knowledge
and awareness of their patients’ faith in the clinical setting.
1
Before the American Revolution, physicians in the United States were
men who became familiar with medicine by traveling to Europe.
2
They were ship’s surgeons, clergy, apothecaries, or anyone who knew
even a little bit about medicine and how to “treat” people, and not
many had a formal education in medicine.
2 Around the 1900s
in the United States, doctors became more prominent in a professional
setting. The professionalism can be attributed to many factors,
including the rise of “scientific medicine’’ as the dominant form of
medicine.2 Scientific medicine began to arise in Europe with the
development of the “germ theory,” and other breakthroughs in medical
research about diseases.
2 American
s
began going to Europe to study medicine and returned to
begin their practices and research. As the United States began to
become a more powerful country at the turn of the twentieth century,
American medicine began to gain momentum.
2 Soon, with the
development of the American Medical Association, the findings from the
Flexner Report on the status of current medical schools in the United
States, and funding and support from powerful people like Carnegie and
Rockefeller, scientific medicine became the dominant form of medicine
in the United States, and the previous other forms of medicine found
themselves at a great disadvantage.
2 Since then,
science-based medicine, now referred to as allopathic medicine, has
been the dominant form of medicine practiced in the United States. With
this, there was a decrease in the number of clergy-physicians; thus
faith and medicine became two separate areas.
While faith and medicine have not been officially practiced together
for almost one hundred years, there has recently been an indication
that faith plays a vital role in the lives of patients who are
experiencing life-changing events such as pregnancy, terminal
illnesses, chronic diseases, unexplained illnesses, heart disease,
recovery from injuries or addictions, and stress.
1, 3 In a
study conducted on patients suffering from advanced lung cancer, the
caregivers of these patients, and their oncologists, the patien
ts and their caregivers suggested that their faith in
God played an important role in determining the type of medical
treatment that they would seek.
4 Their physicians felt,
however that the patients’ faith should be at the bottom of the list of
factors influencing their treatment decisions, perhaps because “their
training is based so heavily on scientific reason that they are unable
to recommend a concept that defies a reasonable explanation.”
4
This study concluded that patients and their caregivers place a great
deal of importance in their faith as they consider treatment options,
and that physicians underestimate the importance that faith plays in
their patients’ lives.
4
Another study conducted on the role of religion for cancer patients
found that when patients were divided in half based on their levels of
pain and fatigue, those considered as having higher spirituality
experienced greater quality of life than those who had comparable
levels of pain and fatigue but lower levels of spirituality.
5
This indicates that faith does play a role in the health of patients,
because even though some patients had high levels of pain, those who
were very spiritual had a better quality of life than those who were
not as spiritual. The study also found that prayer was the most common
form of coping, and breast cancer patients described God as an
“ever-present support, constant companion, and confidante who helped
... their self-esteem and sense of personal control throughout their
illness.”
5
It seems from these studies that while faith does not play a role in
the medical treatment of patients, faith plays a considerable role in
their decisions for treatment and their acceptance of, or
reaction
to, the disease. If this is the case, then
should not physicians have a better understanding of all of the factors
that go into healing of their patients? If so, then how much of a role
should physicians play in the spiritual lives of their patients? Do
patients even want their doctors playing a spiritual role in their
lives?
Interestingly, a study conducted at a teaching hospital at the
University of Pennsylvania found that fifty-one percent of the patients
defined themselves as religious, and of this fifty-one percent,
ninety-four percent thought that their doctors should ask them about
their beliefs if they were to become terminally ill.
1
Forty-five percent of the patients that did not claim to be religious
still thought that physicians should ask them about their beliefs, and
sixteen percent did not want physicians to ask about their spirituality
if they became terminally ill.
1 Studies such as this one
pose the question of how to incorporate a spiritual discussion in a
clinical setting. Since physicians are not clergy, it may seem
out-of-character for a physician to give spiritual advice to a patient,
however, it seems that patients want physicians to discuss these
matters with them when faced with death. There are some methods that
physicians can use in order to measure the spirituality of a patient
which could lead to further discussions, if appropriate. During the
history taking, the patient may be asked if he or she considers
himself/herself to be spiritual or religious, the importance of
these beliefs, the influence of these beliefs, if the
patient belongs to a spiritual community, and what the physician can do
to meet any needs in this area.
1 These questions can give a
physician an indication as to the level of spirituality of a patient
and encourage or discourage further discussions about spirituality
depending on the patient’s answers without interfering with the
patient’s private life.
While some studies have indicated that patients feel it appropriate for
physicians to discuss matters of spirituality in a clinical setting,
physicians still struggle with the boundaries of professionalism and if
they should or should not discuss matters of faith with their patients.
In a study that was done on family physicians and their thoughts on
spirituality in a clinical setting, sixty-eight percent of physicians
from Illinois believed that strong religious beliefs had a positive
affect on the mental health of elderly patients and eighty-eight
percent believed it to be appropriate for physicians to pursue
spiritual issues when the patient requested them.
3 The
doctors from the study who viewed themselves as spiritual, said that
they felt medicine was their mission and their responsibility to act as
“instruments of healing.”
3 About half of the
physicians
in the study said that they discussed
religious beliefs with patients regularly because they believed in the
relationship between faith and health, but agreed that they did not
discuss spirituality without the consent of their patients.
3
However, other physicians did not feel comfortable discussing issues of
faith with their patients.
3 One physician described his
conflict with whether or not faith should be discussed in a clinical
setting: “[Discussing one’s faith with a patient risks being] an abuse
of power; yet if a patient dies tonight and I haven’t shared the Good
News I have ... I’m neglecting something that’s very important.
... How do we do this ... with both gentleness toward the patient
and reverence toward God?”
3
Despite the common form of practice for medicine in the United States
where science dominates, it is clear from recent studies that faith
plays a major factor in patients’ lives. With this in mind, it is
evident that science and faith can work together to achieve better
health. As the studies become better and more evidence is gathered to
support this idea, the physician’s role may be redefined to include
more guidance in spirituality and faith, especially for physicians
working with terminally ill patients.
Literature
Cited
- Post, Stephen G., Christina M. Puchalski, and David B. Larson.
"Physicians and Patient Spirituality: Professional Boundaries,
Competency, and Ethics." Annals of
Internal Medicine 132 (2000): 578-83.
- Cockerman, William C. Medical
Sociology. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2006,
188-96.
- Ellis, Mark R., James D. Campbell, Ann Detwiler-Breidenbach, and
Dena K. Hubbard. "What Do Family Physicians Think about Spirituality in
Clinical Practice?" The Journal of
Family Practice 51 (2002): 249-54.
- Silvestri, Gerard A., Sommer Knittig, James S. Zoller, and Paul
J. Nietert. "Importance of Faith on Medical Decisions Regarding Cancer
Care." Journal of Clinical Oncology
21 (2003): 1379-382.
- Weaver, Andrew J., and Kevin J. Flannerlly. "The Role of
Religion/Spirituality for Cancer Patients and Caregivers." Southern
Medical Journal 97 (2004): 1210-214.